Management of ADD / ADHD
Now Playing
Related Videos
Related Pages
Dr. R Says..
Asperger’s in Adults: You think you know the faces of Asperger’s Autism
Transcription
1:03
parents
1:05
as rapidly as professor patriot memory verses caroline as well as any other
1:10
state in sentencing your
1:13
p_c_r_ carryover two hundred thirty cents an interval numerous books videos
1:18
and subbarao and he is a courtesy have been tested from here
1:23
and this is a true for those of us into the t_v_ as well as a problem and he’s
1:27
going to be in a field that we looked for facilitation and hit
1:32
disinvestment paranoia
1:34
i think that this asking him
1:37
let me know the most recent
1:39
up to date
1:41
have version of what we think the dayton some of the issues that are turning
1:45
around each state
1:47
financially speaking about
1:49
advances understand the nature causes impunity steep
1:53
featuring involvement address america
1:59
got as i said earlier at the uh…
2:02
four copies inflation itself
2:04
i didnt derive great satisfaction and pride from having a spoon as
2:08
accomplishes julian
2:09
all the things that she’s done in her career sewing
2:11
maybe you don’t know that julie was one of my
2:14
dissertation students but we won’t say how long ago that one
2:19
what i’d like to do tonight is to single out some of the many advances that have
2:22
occurred in the last ten years in our understanding and management of a d_h_ d
2:27
and by only half an hour so i may have to skip over a few of these
2:31
it and not come in as much detail as i might ordinarily like to do
2:35
but nevertheless i’m going to get what i think are some of the major highlights
2:38
of
2:39
of what’s new about me dat this disorder that we’ve known about for
2:43
over a hundred years now
2:45
before doing so i am required at these public presentations to disclose my
2:49
sources of support so you can see with her happy conflict of interest and of
2:52
course i have many
2:54
but but the most important one is to know that i have to do consult to every
2:59
pharmaceutical company that has eighty-two medications on the market so
3:03
and have it
3:04
what i would like to do it of course as i’ve said talking about major advances
3:07
in understanding to management identifying cause of a p_h_d_
3:11
isomer spent just a little bit of time on the theory of a deep steve what may
3:15
be going wrong
3:17
under the surface of a teacher because what we have right now is a description
3:20
of someone’s behavior
3:23
when we look at symptoms when we use r_d_ s_m_ criteria for diagnosis when we
3:27
lose reading skills in interviews
3:29
on re-doing his documenting what a person does
3:32
that’s like saying that autistic children
3:35
tawk funny flap their hands and don’t make eye contact
3:38
that’s not a theory of all it is a meta description of certain artistic like
3:43
behaviors
3:44
and what we’re doing today the agency is describing certain aviation like
3:48
behaviors but can we formulate an underlying theory like we’re trying to
3:51
do about it in for a teaching i think the answer is yes or no
3:54
try to do that briefly this evening
3:56
and then i’m going to talk about some of the developments in treatment
3:59
to begin with i would like you to
4:01
sort of appreciate just
4:03
the refinement that has gone on in the last decade of even the description of
4:07
eighty h t
4:08
previously we were just sitting here in attentive in your hyperactive impulsive
4:12
but now we can go much further and specify that kind of in attentiveness
4:16
that you have
4:17
after all there are six different kinds of inattention mediated by the human
4:20
brain
4:21
each has a different world network is probably has different neuro
4:24
transmitters
4:25
helped to mediate this
4:28
a_t_t_ does not interfere with all six of those so
4:31
can we get more precise
4:33
sim defining what makes this an attention disorder as compared to the
4:37
kind of an attempt to c_n_n_’s ivy disorders
4:40
or depression
4:41
or the learning disabilities or in schizophrenia
4:45
they also have attention problems
4:47
they’re not all the same
4:49
so all in attention is not eighty h t
4:52
nor is a dat necessarily a disorder that influences all kinds of inattention
4:58
and we have gotten much more precise
5:01
in showing that eighties he specifically as a problem with persistence toward the
5:05
future processes toward our goal
5:07
the ability to say
5:08
stain behavior over time
5:11
toward attach quickly people would call sustained attention
5:14
but william james over a hundred years ago referred to as persistence
5:19
this aspect of attention is quite unique
5:22
because all other aspects of attention
5:24
are on the information processing side of the human brain
5:28
and this is not
5:29
this is on the motor side of the human brain
5:32
this is how behavior is planned
5:35
organized executed
5:37
and sustain toward a goal
5:39
all of which are largely
5:41
output or motor functions of the brain
5:44
not perceptual functions
5:46
so it would be wrong to say that there is something perceptual e wrong and
5:49
eighty h d there’s no mental filter out of work
5:53
there’s no altered perception of reality the a_t_t_ child seat
5:57
the same reality as a child sitting there subsidies
6:01
where they differ is that the aviation individual reacts to death that reality
6:06
responds to those events differently
6:08
than other people
6:09
and one of those differences in responding
6:12
is the inability to sustain
6:14
that response
6:16
until the task is accomplished until the goal is achieved
6:20
so i think that’s an important distinction because it will separate the
6:23
kind of attention problem
6:26
anxiety doesn’t produce that depression doesn’t produce tab
6:29
those aren’t the kinds of things we see in the learning disabilities
6:33
which also have some attentional disturbances associated with them
6:37
the second problem with attention which is of course very tightly linked to the
6:40
first
6:41
is resistance to distraction
6:43
and that makes sense you can see that they’re opposite sides of a common coin
6:47
in other words if you can process that’s because you can resist interference
6:51
and if you’re capable of existing distraction you can probably persist
6:54
towards your goals
6:56
so there really are highly correlated with each other
6:59
the ability to resist interference is what asus
7:03
sites in our persistence
7:05
toward the goals that we are holding in mind the task we need to accomplish
7:09
so there is imperative
7:11
distracted billy
7:12
but unlike what laypeople in teachers think the distract ability is upon the
7:17
sensory side of our brain as i’ve already sent
7:19
the person with a beach he doesn’t perceive is distracting event that you
7:22
didn’t hear or see
7:25
they hear and see the same thing you do and vice versa
7:28
the differences that reacted to that distracting event
7:31
when the board went by the window when they heard the conversation the hallway
7:35
when they heard the harley-davidson go by the classroom
7:38
that provokes a response
7:40
the other children suppress
7:42
because it’s irrelevant to the goal to the task
7:45
the ability to suppress responding to irrelevant events
7:49
is this destructive melody this is the topic it’s not goes to the window looks
7:53
out starts talking about harlem says is that has one wants know if you want one
7:57
by the way to go to the normal beach national running conventions i went
8:00
there last year to really kind of cool
8:03
to see what happens there off and running on this chain of tangential
8:07
thinking and behaving
8:09
but that’s the motor abnormality
8:12
not sensory abnormality
8:14
so the idea that a p_h_d_ children picking up on things
8:18
you and i don’t receive flutes
8:22
there is a third aspect of the attention of the servants that fascinates
8:26
to leave myself
8:27
others who are here to buy the person are you talking about this as well
8:31
and that is
8:33
a_t_t_ individuals can not
8:35
holden mind information
8:37
that guides behavior toward a goal and this shows up very clearly
8:42
because when they’re distracted
8:45
something they do that you and i don’t know
8:47
is they don’t return to the task
8:49
u_n_ ironman were distracted and you will be distracted because some events
8:52
are two compelling to ignore
8:55
the phone call that comes in for instance that you have to take now so
8:58
you start writing and shifting talk
9:00
but what do you know singer and if i go back to what you’re doing
9:04
the aviation person does not
9:06
that distracting event
9:07
house now destroyed this capacity
9:10
to keep the golden mind
9:12
now holding information in mind
9:14
that is guiding behavior toward our goal
9:17
is working memory
9:19
that’s the part of the brain that allows you to do that
9:22
so here we see that there’s an aspect of the p_h_d_ has nothing to do with
9:26
attention
9:27
it has to do with the capacity to keep information in your head
9:32
actively
9:33
in mind
9:34
while you were pursuing that goal
9:37
edinburgh psychology we call that working memory which many people should
9:40
simply refer to is this
9:42
remembering so heads to too
9:45
it is a special kind of memory which is why it’s called working memory
9:49
which distinguishes it from the traditional memory system
9:52
of the hippocampus and storage and retrieval up information
9:57
this does not have to do with that system
9:59
this is a different system
10:01
remembering
10:02
treat do twitching losing your fifties
10:06
under her eyes
10:07
and that’s what women lose in perry menopause big time
10:12
what you are losing is the capacity to hold in mind which we’re doing
10:17
and sega development by wife is affectionately called the but first send
10:21
i went into my office because i needed to handle this but i saw have been
10:25
waiting to be paid for her at her
10:28
men and women
10:29
overhear should be
10:32
novel environmental chronograph prior
10:36
there is a warning that
10:39
endure the wondering if the government generated and policy studies
10:43
but
10:49
villa states the point
10:51
in other words
10:52
but now the events around him
10:55
have become more compelling
10:57
than what you were holding the line
11:00
and so when people age
11:02
or hit menopause
11:04
what you’re experiencing is very similar to what people with the dhtml
11:08
experiencing since childhood
11:09
simply magnify it fire for factor of ten
11:14
but if you took those has a little baby h_d_ government particularly as working
11:18
memory begins to decline
11:20
and in older life
11:22
you don’t lose your memory
11:24
lucia working
11:27
is a fascinating discovery because
11:30
working memory is one of the five major executive functions there may be more
11:34
than five this is debatable
11:36
but most researchers technology at lease
11:39
five distinct executive abilities
11:42
and if working memory is one of them
11:44
and that is the session in a p_h_d_
11:46
it does rate the raised the question
11:49
are the others
11:51
is this an executive disordered
11:54
rather than an attention disorder
11:55
it certainly is more than an attention disorder
11:58
and its findings like that and others
12:00
that have led many of us in this field to begin exploring
12:04
the other executive activities
12:07
and whether a d_h_ tina viduals are deficient in those
12:10
and we’ll talk about them short
12:12
but you can see then that certainly under detention we are coming to realize
12:17
that’d isn’t inattention
12:19
it’s more and
12:21
and that he has some five is not going to reflect that
12:24
in the year twenty eleven
12:26
it will relabel
12:28
this list of symptoms
12:30
as reflecting more than
12:33
which it should treated
12:35
now there’s a second problem jackie develops first
12:39
and it’s an inhibition problem
12:41
and the hyperactivity comes from that
12:43
so that the excessive activity of the young a_d_d_ child is not distinct
12:48
symptom from the others
12:50
it’s part of the inhibitory problem
12:53
it’s a preschoolers
12:55
symptom of in addition deficits
12:57
as a preschooler agents
13:00
hyperactivity is going to decline quite markedly
13:02
such that by adolescents it is becoming more of a subjective internal
13:07
feeling the need to be busy
13:09
and to be engaging in multiple things that you never finish but doing multiple
13:13
things
13:14
and by adulthood hyperactivity is of no value
13:18
for diagnosis it’s one of the findings of my new book that i spoke about
13:21
earlier today an adult eighty each day
13:24
which is one of the first release of show that in adults
13:27
restlessness is actually of
13:29
no doubt in three different about this
13:31
in fact it tends to go with anxiety disorders by itself
13:35
not with adult medium xti
13:37
but the inhibition problem that gave rise to it
13:41
impulse of thinking
13:43
the inability to control your motor reactions to things around him
13:47
persists
13:48
much longer
13:49
into adulthood and it’s one of the top three distinguishing features
13:53
of the absolves the kitchen
13:55
makes impulsive decisions
13:57
fails to think before they act
14:01
so if you need to understand that some of this this sort of superficial
14:05
hyperactivity may decline
14:06
but its underlying problem with inhibition is not declining quite so
14:10
much
14:11
and you can see that here
14:14
even though this is a description of people with a p_h_d_
14:17
we’ve been able to refine that description for her
14:20
down to something more precise that allows us to say
14:24
what eighty eight he is
14:26
and what it isn’t antoinette anxiety disorder is
14:29
and when it isn’t there are no other disorders i’m aware of
14:33
that produce these problems
14:36
chronicling
14:37
unremitting
14:38
dating from childhood
14:41
other disorder
14:43
so if your focus on what is precise about me dat really helps permissions
14:47
and their diagnosis
14:49
is that this is that there is a fine holders of generalized anxiety
14:53
and now we can begin to do that because the other disorders don’t do this
14:57
in a chronic
14:59
unremitting course
15:02
another advance has been in the typing of a_t_t_
15:05
since nineteen ninety four
15:07
we have been experimenting with a way of typing a_t_t_ in our diagnostic man
15:13
we’ve had three types
15:15
we’ve had people who only have the inattentive deficits
15:19
and have less problems of hyperactive impulsive behavior that’s the intent of
15:22
group
15:23
we have the inverse group of people
15:26
and we have the majority who have both of these deficits and we call them the
15:30
combined type
15:32
and we’ve been studying this way of subtyping eighty-eight reason that we
15:36
can now ask the question
15:38
what’s missing useful scheme useful strategy
15:41
ort this turned out to be simply the result of the fact that we had
15:45
to lists
15:47
and as with the chinese restaurant menu
15:50
if you have column a in column b
15:53
you can make three things out of two columns
15:57
in other words it’s not very useful
15:59
and the answer turns out to be the second one
16:03
and so in twenty eleven we will of the end of this approach
16:07
because it has no clinical
16:09
or research value
16:11
it turns out that mediates the isn’t three things
16:15
it’s one thing
16:16
and these are simply variations and severity
16:19
because people move from these into decent firms here over the here because
16:24
they’re hyperactivity is declining
16:26
but that the assembly sense this is three types of something
16:30
when in fact it’s a dimension
16:32
at the recent severity
16:34
and it’s a single disorder in the population
16:37
so this will be cut
16:40
now what’s to replace
16:42
well the europeans have been doing something that we have avoided doing
16:46
but it turns out they were probably right
16:50
at least twenty years they have sub-type paper connecticut disorder which is what
16:54
they called this for me
16:56
into those who were hyperactive with conduct disorder and without condoms
17:02
we are in the u_s_ and north america more generally
17:06
view this is simply co morbidity
17:08
one disorder just happen to occur with another
17:11
and therefore if we were correct
17:13
what you should see in the combined group
17:15
is what you would expect if you added one disorder
17:18
to the second disorder
17:20
additive
17:22
but in fact when you study the combined group
17:25
what you find it it’s not active
17:28
it’s quantum leap
17:30
works
17:31
both disorders start much earlier
17:34
in the combine
17:36
both disorders are highly persistent
17:39
much more so overdevelopment
17:41
then when pete’s disorder occurs along
17:44
the families again tries to these combined shipment
17:47
arm markedly more impaired
17:49
with much higher rates of psychiatric disorders
17:52
critically antisocial personality disorder alcoholism
17:55
drug use and major depression
17:58
we know that one and five of these children
18:02
will have the traits we associate with adults psychopathy
18:06
the psychopath
18:07
these are what we call the callous unemotional traits
18:10
lack of empathy
18:12
lack of conscience
18:13
lack of kilts
18:14
and remorse
18:16
and combined with that
18:17
isn’t instrumental predatory
18:20
form of intentional aggression
18:22
they prayed on the other people
18:25
and this starts very early in the lives of these children
18:29
hof rick has shown that we can identify psychopathic children
18:32
not just adults
18:34
and that they’re likely to be found within this group
18:38
a_d_d_ alone does not give rise to the cycle
18:41
neither does conduct disorder love them
18:43
so there is something about this combination
18:46
that does suck
18:47
which is just one more example
18:49
of light when they occur together
18:52
isn’t just overlap
18:54
it’s a stitch form of a beach t
18:57
so those of us to do behavioral genetic studies are now studying them
19:01
a separate group
19:02
i think that mirror imaging people might want to take a second look at that well
19:06
because if you combine the main
19:08
with your purely a p_h_d_ group your adding and norway’s
19:12
when you could have had more homogeneous groups of people
19:15
because we now believe that there are physiological differences
19:18
between these groups
19:20
for instance this group
19:21
shows a much more reduced response to stress
19:25
whether measured through the hypo pituitary axis and cortisol secretion of
19:29
saliva
19:30
whether measured through the
19:33
sympathetic nervous sleazy parasympathetic nervous system
19:36
and once galvanic skin response and heartbreak deceleration
19:40
and expiratory changes
19:43
these individuals
19:44
couple marked
19:45
altered response
19:46
alone response to stress
19:49
then do ordinary children or each teacher
19:52
so there is something about these individuals both biologically
19:57
psychiatrically
19:59
developmentally
19:59
and familiar with that points to this being a distinct group of people
20:04
and i think you’ll see in the s and five we’re likely
20:07
to use that
20:08
as a more useful approach for clinicians sub-type their patients
20:12
then this
20:14
far less useful view d_d_t_
20:18
now weakened dispense with the hyperactive type
20:21
because it turns out to simply be the preschool stage of the combine type
20:25
in which wanted to build studies have shown that over ninety percent of people
20:29
cold this time
20:30
eventually get the combined
20:32
you just caught them young
20:34
and that’s because the hyperactive impulsive symptoms start earlier
20:38
then the inattention an executive deficits to but within three to four
20:42
years they will be combined type and even if they aren’t
20:45
they miss it by just a single sin
20:48
which means they’re just a milder variant of the combined
20:51
now there are a few children in here who are already only oppositional on that
20:56
won’t say much about them
20:58
but it’s simply a group of children where parents confused oppositional
21:02
behavior with the agency
21:04
as the oppositional disorders outgrown
21:07
the each disappears
21:09
and that’s because oppositional disorder when it occurs alone is benign
21:13
at fifty percent of all cases disappear every two years follow
21:17
now when oppositional disorder occurs with another disorder like bipolar
21:20
disorder reviewed your conduct disorder
21:23
is a highly persistent disorder
21:25
but occurring alone it is not the disorder to get very excited about
21:30
and that’s usually what we’re seeing here i’m not going to spend more time
21:33
skits but the lesson there
21:35
is that there is no hyperactive technical wants
21:38
now this is a group of children worthy of more comment
21:42
because
21:43
while some of these children are clearly variations are combined to children
21:48
and need to be reclassified as such
21:51
that is a group leftover
21:53
are quite different
21:55
and it’s anywhere from thirty to fifty percent of all children
21:59
called inattentive
22:00
only a p_h_d_ children
22:02
researchers have invented the term for these it’s not a diagnosis if you use
22:06
outside this room of missions have never heard of it
22:09
but in the research literature this is the term that is being used to describe
22:12
this unique
22:14
group of individuals
22:15
i believe this is a separate disorder from eighty h_d_ lurking within the
22:20
larger sample of eighty-eight years been another attention disorder
22:23
but even my conservative colleagues like steven shortest
22:27
down the road at u_c_ berkeley
22:29
even though he would say that maybe it is in a separate disorder with agree
22:33
that it’s qualitatively different from the combined type a_t_t_
22:37
whether you’re in the disorder camp or the subtyping abundant here
22:42
finding that is important tonight is that there are many
22:46
qualitative difference is that
22:48
aren’t worthy of appreciation
22:50
first of all the symptoms shown
22:52
in the air c_t_ child
22:54
are the opposite of eighty h_d_ symptoms
22:58
this is a steering child
23:00
at teaching the child
23:02
a passive child
23:04
who is lost art work
23:06
slow-moving
23:08
sluggish
23:09
scalars
23:10
this is the trial that is often viewed as mentally spacey
23:15
foggy
23:16
and appears to not be attending well to reality around
23:22
those in many cases at the end to the since
23:26
of the each to child who is distracted pple
23:29
impulsive
23:30
active
23:31
engaging
23:32
in your face
23:33
but they do you teach our to come into this room you would know in minutes
23:37
it’s an s_a_t_ charlie come into this room you would never know what
23:42
so the difference in the air
23:45
disrupt development
23:46
to the environments quite striking
23:48
this is not the destructive group of children
23:52
p_h_d_ trucks clearly disruptive
23:55
now there are other differences
23:57
a_d_ h_d_ is not information processing disorder
24:00
dissidents
24:02
suggesting there’s something in the peripheral
24:05
or in the sensory analyzers of the brain the post courier aspects of the brain
24:10
where this disorder lines
24:12
those of us in a row psychology
24:14
or tantalized by the finding that
24:16
the symptoms and the processing problems
24:19
reminders of children who have white matter disease of the brain
24:23
where there’s been a disruption in the cortical subcortical loops processing
24:26
information
24:28
eighty h two children do not show
24:30
now i don’t know that that’s the source of their problem i’m just
24:34
drawing an analogy here
24:35
the powder enough cognitive impairment
24:38
resembles that of
24:39
other posterior disorders
24:41
and not of the eda to trial
24:45
when we look at the kind of attention impaired out of the six dimensions of
24:49
attention
24:50
these children are very concerned that the detention
24:53
to the ability to identify rapidly what is important in front of you
24:57
from what is not
24:59
some people call that focused attention
25:01
but it’s really are selective aspect of attention
25:06
when we look at their memory systems the a_t_t_ child has a working memory
25:10
problem they forget to do
25:12
these trials children seem to have a retrieval problem out of storage of
25:15
memory
25:16
but i had a question mark because it’s very understudy
25:20
so i don’t want to pass it off of something definitive
25:23
certainly worth further examination
25:25
what is much more definitive
25:27
is that the social impairment of these children
25:29
by the opposite of a d_h_ teacher
25:32
these are surely children
25:34
reticent
25:35
apprehensive
25:36
less involved
25:38
now unlike the asperger’s an autistic spectrum disorders orthostatic hypo
25:43
schizophrenic disorders they’re not pollute and disinterested and other
25:47
people
25:48
it’s not that they have a disregard for socializing with other cities
25:51
so much more typical of the autistic spectrum children
25:54
they do want friends they are interested
25:57
and they have appropriately so appropriate social skills
26:00
that just a little more anxious
26:02
little shop a little hesitant
26:04
but you don’t see the operatives
26:06
that you see in the s_p_ and indeed skits type of children
26:10
you can see the bizarre aspects of interaction
26:13
that supervisors of their children
26:15
so what you’re really seeing here is a wall flower
26:18
these children have friends
26:20
not as many as normal children
26:22
but far more than eighty aged children do
26:25
haiti child is likely to be friendless by second or third grade that is not
26:29
true with the extra
26:31
these children by definition have no inhibitory deficit
26:35
a dat at its core isn’t in addition to sir
26:39
if we were to place
26:41
in primacy
26:43
one of the three sensitivity p_h_d_ it would be the immigration problem
26:47
that is that one of the central features that theorists have repeatedly going
26:50
back to
26:52
as part of a d_h_ d
26:54
that is not the case with this disorder
26:56
this alone
26:58
supports my argument that this is a separate disorder
27:01
because these children black
27:03
the parent cora feature of the defines the each teacher
27:07
which is the inhibition problem
27:09
there are differences in coe morbidity
27:12
disorders ago with a p_h_d_ are quite different
27:15
a_d_d_ children have markedly higher risk for oppositional disorder as i
27:19
mentioned in my previous talked this afternoon
27:22
a substantial minority go on to develop conduct disorder
27:25
these children carry very low grades for those disorders
27:29
probably no higher than the population greater if they are
27:32
their in significantly higher
27:34
whereas the a_t_t_ child markedly higher in contrast
27:39
research is quite convincing
27:41
that anxiety is much more feature of this group of children
27:44
and even if the each teacher
27:46
now about twenty five percent of the beach to children
27:49
have an anxiety disorder
27:50
but the rates are higher among these children
27:53
it’s less clear that depression
27:55
is elevated
27:56
we used to think that it was
27:58
that they need to children carry a risk of depression too
28:01
and the differences are not impressive at least not at this point
28:04
they’re more aggressive for anxiety
28:08
both children suffer in school
28:10
equally infect
28:11
but if one studies that
28:13
colleen of mistakes
28:15
the reason behind the school failure they choose seem to be qualitatively
28:19
different
28:21
these children have more problems with their arms in school work
28:24
a dat child has problems with production of work
28:28
number of problems done
28:30
and all the hype oversimplified since both groups of children probably have
28:34
both kinds of problems the relative proportion of errors
28:38
i think is worst
28:41
emphasizing
28:41
the immediate future up has a production disorder primarily
28:45
this chart isn’t that a receipt disorder
28:48
now these children have been found
28:50
to be more likely to have math disorders
28:52
but i don’t want to overplay the point because only a few studies have looked
28:55
at this
28:57
but we know the children with massive sorors
28:59
have a pattern of in attentiveness very similar to what we’ve seen here
29:03
and markedly different from what is seen a_t_t_
29:06
a comprehensive review of all research on
29:09
masters or response just a few months ago
29:11
make this point very clearly
29:13
that there are different attention problems associated with now
29:17
suggesting again that these children might be more prone to those problems
29:20
the families of different
29:22
eighty eighty families have more eighty h t
29:24
more schools down here
29:26
or conduct problems and more drug use problems
29:29
these children come from families with more learning disabilities
29:32
and more anxiety disorders
29:34
but we only have a couple of studies
29:36
and again emphasizing
29:38
it’s not a definitive finding family history
29:41
what is beginning to become clear in the last five years
29:44
is that there are differences in treatment response
29:47
the most compelling evidence
29:49
was the
29:50
stimulant steps
29:51
mainly done but not often a date none without a roll of the amphetamines and
29:55
certainly none without a mock fatine
29:57
which is trickier
29:58
but certainly not the phonetic studies show that the response of these children
30:01
to stimulus as unimpressive
30:03
my own study at u_-mass gunman julie was back there chica for gutless
30:08
shows about a twenty percent rate of response among these children
30:12
verses over ninety two percent of combine type children in that study
30:17
responded
30:18
to one or more of the doses of students
30:22
ours was one of the few dose-response studies
30:24
bother to simply found a rather lackluster
30:26
or mediocre response i want to make the point clear here
30:30
we’re not saying that stimulus because children works
30:33
what we’re saying is that they don’t help them
30:35
the response is not dramatic
30:37
not clinically impressive
30:38
you would argue for keeping this trial on medication after the trial
30:43
so even though there’s a slight improvement
30:45
it’s not worth some money side effects
30:48
the effort
30:49
to retain them in the trial
30:50
so we’re beginning to see the potential
30:53
evidence that stimulants are not really
30:55
the drugs for these children like they are
30:57
for combine type a_t_t_
30:59
there is growing body of evidence that these children are among the best
31:03
responders to social skills
31:04
eighty h detroit either don’t respond a social skills training or the skill
31:08
training response please
31:10
very unimpressive it does not generalize
31:13
outside the training environment
31:15
and one-in-four a_d_d_ children they actually get worse
31:19
people need to understand social skills training produces side effects
31:22
that some children engage in what we called t_v_ n c training
31:26
where aggressive children in the group train up the non-aggressive chosen to
31:29
become more aggressive children first
31:32
finally this email for your internet gardens of find
31:36
young children for start school again a garden become much more aggressive
31:39
during the first three to six months of kindergarten
31:42
so there really is eight downside to social skills training the commission
31:46
should not ignore
31:49
we need to remember that social skills training was originally invented in the
31:52
nineteen sixties for the treatment options
31:55
and it continues to show its most robust effects with anxious internalizing
32:01
and reticent people
32:03
the data on people with disruptive acting out to support much less
32:08
impressive
32:09
than it is on internalizing disorders
32:11
and that begins to explain why it’s the shiny d_h_ teacher i’ll
32:15
who seems to respond so well here
32:18
as opposed to disruptive a_t_t_ trial
32:21
now i will argue that these children might do better in behavioral
32:24
interventions there’s now a study of the however
32:27
but we can’t logically draw this inference
32:30
at least a potential reason to
32:32
further research in because the large studied known as the m_t_a_ study larger
32:36
study every kind of a view to treatment
32:39
found that the single best predictor of who did well
32:41
in treatment was anxiety
32:43
the more anxious you were the better you responded to the psychological and
32:47
behavioral and school interventions
32:49
and since these are the most anxious at the eighty each group
32:53
it would lead one to argue that they may well be our best responders to seconds
32:57
of treatment
32:58
we might fight here at work already seen for social skills training
33:02
now cognitive training which is teaching children to talk to themselves has been
33:06
tested
33:08
extensively for eighty hdmi
33:09
sales
33:10
we do not recommended as intervention
33:13
it works better
33:14
for anxiety
33:15
for depression
33:16
for internalizing symptoms
33:18
but home alone
33:19
this is an immediate each day
33:21
so don’t throw the baby out with the past year and assume that because a
33:24
treatment failed for a d_h_ d
33:27
it shouldn’t be used for s
33:29
c_t_
33:30
i actually believe there is good reason to think
33:33
the cognitive training program that would assist these children
33:36
first of all cognitive therapy helps anxious people
33:39
so it mite will help them only with their anxiety
33:43
but because these children appear to have normal internal language
33:46
for a speedy age the children are delayed in internal language
33:50
cognitive therapy might work for the straw
33:53
or is it doesn’t work for a p_h_d_ because of this failure
33:56
to develop appropriate
33:58
internal speech
33:59
and then finally i have pressured the lilly company
34:02
to test for tour with these children and the reason i ask them to do so and they
34:06
are now doing so
34:08
is because of a study published a few months ago
34:11
showing that’s pretty retreat anxiety will become a cruise with a p_h_d_
34:16
stimulus do not read anxiety
34:17
and there is a proposed literature suggested it probably worse incident
34:21
some children but not at all
34:23
but here is an instance
34:25
where we have a drug to treat spokes disorders
34:29
maybe it would help the strong
34:31
neuropsychology listener a scientist in the room also would recognize
34:35
but the kind of attention problem seems to be here
34:38
certainly mimics those that are associated with nora epinephrine
34:41
disorders
34:43
and might well be more responsive to a norepinephrine agent which is what’s for
34:46
tea brigades
34:48
and so just another hypothesis
34:51
not proof
34:53
don’t leave here saying barclay says fifty retreats and seating i have not
34:57
set that whatsoever and they can’t go to dinner
35:01
say that i sent that budetti reason why science would want to look
35:06
more closely
35:08
an asset
35:09
what we can say that in the last decade
35:11
we found another disorder
35:14
it seems to be within the d_d_t_ population but probably isn’t a_t_t_
35:19
i’m not sure yet whether it’s a distinct kind of eighty h t as others argue
35:24
or whether it might earlier suspicions are true that it’s actually separate
35:28
disorder
35:29
and needs to be treated as such india sinn fein
35:32
tedious and five committee bills don’t eat mac forever
35:35
now if any area has seen advances in the last decade
35:39
it has been an ideology the cause of the t
35:42
we can now say
35:44
without a doubt the a_t_t_
35:47
multi causal
35:48
there are many
35:50
roads to rome
35:51
ways to get a p_h_d_
35:53
we can’t just as safely say
35:55
that none of them
35:57
fault with the domain
35:59
social factors
36:00
it is impossible
36:02
to take a normal child
36:03
and expose them to nec societal
36:07
and produce this disorder
36:08
and i believe i can be made now
36:11
unequivocally
36:12
although known causes of a d_h_ t are in the biological factors
36:17
particularly the realm of neurology and genetics which are not dissociated from
36:20
each other better in fact
36:23
related fields of etiology
36:25
and we now know that there could be multiple causes within these domains
36:31
compounding each other and interact with each other
36:33
to produce the v_ chip
36:34
we are beginning to find through
36:37
work such as julies work here
36:39
under limited
36:40
many other studies such as the initials and that can studies
36:43
in the nineteen nineties
36:45
and the m_r_i_ and f_m_ orion and pet
36:48
inspect
36:49
and other neuroimaging devices
36:51
that eighty h d
36:52
is associated with at least four brain regions
36:55
that have been referred to
36:57
by these three
36:58
as the front of stride
37:00
cerebellar circuitry now known to be the inhibition circuit
37:04
of the brain size of the circuit the amount of activity within the circuit
37:08
race directly related
37:09
to impulse control
37:11
so we’re beginning to make some very
37:14
broad conclusions about causation but we can now to see
37:19
the absolutely ridiculous claim such as the syndicated columnist john rosslyn
37:23
that eighty eighty is the result of television
37:26
of port discipline
37:27
of lack of love
37:29
the notion of peter break-in
37:31
and the scientologists
37:33
that eighty h_d_ is the result of family factors
37:36
and not the result of biological factors we have many studies that can disprove
37:41
these ideas
37:43
we have learned from any many studies especially summarized in the brilliant
37:48
textbook by joel made public last summer
37:51
on what causes a beauty
37:53
that about a third of eighty h_d_ he’s acquired
37:57
due to central nervous system injuries
37:59
most of which occur prenatally
38:01
and you can see here a list of the factors
38:04
that have been identified reliably
38:06
some that we have strong suspicions about
38:08
but still need further research associate it with them
38:12
some that we can roll out
38:14
and while cocaine exposed babies have high rates of the peachtree
38:18
research now shows the isn’t the cocaine
38:22
it’s what these women due to themselves
38:25
women who are crack abusers are polly drug abusers
38:28
they smoke
38:29
they drink
38:30
they have high rates of adult dvd
38:33
their malnourished
38:34
and they have premature babies
38:36
those are the things that are causing their babies p_b_h_g_
38:40
not actually the use of the cocaine itself
38:44
so we’re learning then about prenatal
38:47
factors that contribute
38:48
a small percentage of a d_h_ is clearly caused by postnatal injuries after first
38:54
such things as you might expect
38:56
head trauma
38:58
blunt trauma for instance or even penetrating atms
39:01
lead poisoning has a long rich history
39:04
of association with a dat we know that lead is a toxin to determine brain
39:08
that it has a particular affinity for the frontal lobes
39:11
and especially
39:12
for the dopamine pathways
39:14
so it’s understood why that might be the case we’ve known the children with
39:18
leukemia
39:19
can develop a post leukemia eighty h t
39:22
but it now resembles more the s c_t_ pattern of symptoms i’ve mentioned
39:26
which explains why the stimulants are not showing a very impressive
39:30
responsive treating children who survived leukemia for their
39:34
post-treatment abt
39:35
if some fascinating work
39:37
on the role of the immune system
39:38
an a_t_a_ cheaper at petersons of someone a more familiar
39:42
but i learned this morning a meeting with a number of citeseer
39:44
of some absolutely fascinating cutting-edge research going on here at
39:48
the mind institute
39:49
on the role
39:51
immune factors in the immune system
39:53
and only in autism
39:54
probably an eighty h p
39:56
as well
39:57
and of course
39:58
we’ve known the children with peak a view
40:00
have high rates of a_t_t_
40:02
and of the executive deficits that go with them but we’re now finding that one
40:07
doesn’t have to have the severe condition a few keep noria
40:10
that just higher than normal levels as a chemical involve
40:14
in peak a view which is from a aloni in both the mothers and the baby’s blood
40:18
stream
40:18
is associated with higher rates
40:20
of executive deficits and it each day
40:23
suggesting that one doesn’t have to be some toxic
40:26
without allowing us to be peak a view
40:28
but just higher than normal levels may be poisoning
40:32
the frontal system
40:33
and the executive activities that take place there
40:36
we know from julius research from castallanos and many others
40:40
that the brains of a_t_t_ children are smaller
40:44
and less mature
40:45
not enough that there are damaging can be used for diagnosis
40:48
but enough that when we average groups of t_v_ age these games together
40:52
we can begin to see
40:53
about a three to ten percent smaller area
40:56
of brain development in the
40:59
orbital frontal cortex particulars are right side
41:02
in the basal ganglia deep inside the brain particularly the striatum
41:05
in the cerebellum again more on the right then the left
41:09
and also within the interior cingulate
41:12
although the interior section of the semester they seem to be smaller
41:15
as julies research has shown an others
41:17
by george bush for instance of hartford
41:20
dot the george bush another a
41:23
not not yet
41:24
but bushes research like julies finds that the interior single it is massively
41:29
under active
41:30
in various towns
41:31
that d_d_t_ people have trouble with
41:34
when we know from charge research that these are persistent findings
41:39
overtime in from childhood to adolescents
41:42
and contrary to the claims of scientologists
41:44
these are not the result of giving stimulants for children but our founding
41:48
stimulant naive children never treated previously
41:51
the region’s we’re talking about the right orbital frontal area here
41:55
this is the basal ganglia deep inside the brain
41:58
particularly the stratum which is this seems like structure here
42:02
and then the cerebellum which is a very primitive structure at the back of the
42:05
brain
42:06
it’s mainly the central area here as well
42:10
you can see here as well
42:11
in the functional deficits
42:13
this is some of the research by beth k seat
42:16
showing that there are both
42:18
the series the anterior cingulate medial aspect of the frontal lobe
42:22
as well as the great frontal lobe showing that it is associated with
42:26
patterns of under activity
42:28
in people with a p_h_d_
42:30
you can see a separation
42:31
in function between normal
42:33
and a_t_t_ individuals
42:35
in this relatively recent study
42:38
this is a study published just a month ago
42:40
absolute fascinating cereal
42:42
neuroimaging study
42:45
and this study was five yeah
42:47
social and his colleagues at the n_i_h_
42:50
and think you can see here
42:51
date the
42:52
scan children
42:53
every few years four different times across the government
42:58
and then computed which areas of the brain were behind at least three years
43:02
or more
43:03
in their maturation
43:04
to normal brain size not support understand
43:07
study a structure
43:09
brain size
43:10
the study of function
43:12
but what you’re seeing here and the darker than blue
43:15
the greater the leading
43:17
are the areas of the brain that are at least two years behind
43:21
in their maturation
43:22
one can see here graphically
43:24
if one plots the match a regional curves
43:27
from normal children
43:29
and for each each teacher over
43:30
the difference of course showing the delay
43:33
to reaching falls structural brain size in a d_h_ uses one of many studies
43:39
showing that there is a neurobiology kal basis to this disorder
43:43
and quite consistent with argued that this is a developmental disorder
43:47
not been aberration or psychopathology
43:50
that it represents a delay in maturation
43:53
a fascinating finding in the study
43:55
is that there is a small region in the brain this over developed
43:59
short early in the eighty eight ij shle
44:02
it matures too quickly
44:04
and many of you if you know neuroscience note this is the brains of primary
44:08
industries
44:09
and basically what you can conclude from this time
44:12
is that this is probably the source of the hyperactivity
44:15
you’ve got and over rich or motor system
44:18
and then under majority executive system that ordinarily would be regulating it
44:23
and hence you have a
44:26
discredited individual
44:28
now important emphasized said bushes study took no measures of symptoms
44:32
it can say nothing about whether or not
44:34
these individuals are normal by adolescents and children and my girl
44:38
your talk today or not
44:40
and certainly this is not a study of brain function
44:43
functional neuroimaging studies like julies and others down here and
44:46
elsewhere
44:47
clearly showed that there are functional differences
44:50
in children and adults with a p_h_d_
44:53
but the shaw study is remarkable
44:55
in once again documenting
44:57
the developmental delay that a_t_t_ produces
45:00
i won’t spend time on here
45:02
i have showed a slight only data list rate the complexity
45:05
of the neuroscience research going on we know there are at least three different
45:10
circuits
45:11
within these brain structures not want
45:14
and that each of these while regulated to a large extent by dopamine
45:18
may produce different symptoms and different behavioral expressions
45:22
so that some children might be disturbed and one aspect of the past way
45:26
others in two or three
45:28
helping to explain some of the heterogeneity that we see in a d_h_ is a
45:32
very fascinating research but
45:33
to recycle them
45:35
or recently punctual nick
45:36
and have your across the lungs
45:38
on brain circuitry let’s just to show you like a t_v_ schematic
45:42
that there are these three brain circuits
45:45
each of which involves dopamine each of which would produce a different set of
45:49
deficits
45:50
ingredients to the individuals
45:52
why is the brain smaller
45:53
well i think genetics holds the answer
45:55
we’ve known for decades since the early studies by marcin pile up
46:00
and dennis cantwell u_c_l_a_ at the honor of being this year’s cantwell
46:04
lecturer next tuesday
46:05
at the neuropsychiatric institute at u_c_l_a_
46:08
in honor of dennis is work
46:11
going all the way back even when i was an undergraduate we’ve known that he dat
46:15
strongly inherited disorder
46:17
you can see the risk to relatives of the child has a p_h_d_
46:20
the higher risks of siblings and twins
46:23
and the fact that their parents are likely to have the same disorder
46:26
and look at the market elevation
46:28
if the parent has a p_h_d_ in the risk to children
46:32
beverages forty to fifty percent
46:34
meaning if you’re an adult with a view to half of your children
46:37
are going to express this disorder
46:40
markedly higher elevation
46:42
a fascinating funding for research but i don’t want too much
46:45
is the first paper demonstrating the possibility
46:49
imprinting in the genes for p_b_h_g_
46:52
we know that mammals
46:54
when they give their genes to their offspring
46:56
are likely to take the gene
46:58
with a little flat called on the phone from
47:01
that tells whether the gene
47:02
came from the mother
47:03
or the father
47:05
sent the gene seem to express differently
47:07
depending upon its origin
47:09
and although the gene himself as identical when you look at it sequence
47:13
it the way it activates these different depending upon which sucks it came from
47:18
so that the parents and improve your genes
47:21
with the gender of origin
47:23
and gurus and
47:24
chakkar at
47:25
the hospital for sick children
47:27
have published the first study suggesting that that there may be
47:31
genetic imprinting
47:33
impeach ki
47:34
depending upon whether the genes come down from the father is with the mother
47:37
signed the family
47:38
may alter the expression and severity of the eighty h p
47:42
and to some extent determined
47:44
risk for other comorbid disorders
47:46
now this needs to be replicated but
47:48
i’m just trying to show you the excitement in this period of research
47:52
and the fact that were beginning to see
47:54
novel area of research and never before studied psychiatric disorders in
47:58
children
47:59
and that is the notion that
48:01
although genes may be identical
48:03
the gender origin of the gene parent contributing the gene
48:07
may well alter the expression of that team to some extent
48:10
now we know from many different studies now numbering more than forty
48:14
when the most reliable findings in research and he’d be tricky
48:18
is the striking heritability
48:20
heritability except
48:21
number we calculate and twin studies the tells us
48:24
how much of the variation in the human population
48:27
in fact right
48:29
is the result of differences in our teens
48:31
takes human height for instance
48:33
if i remember all of you
48:34
and plot your height on a distribution
48:37
i could show that ninety one percent of the variation and height among people in
48:41
this room
48:42
is entirely due to differences in your genes
48:45
and you would have understand that paul families get vargas two twelve children
48:48
short families who have children
48:50
obviously this being the physical traits
48:52
genes are playing a very instrumental role
48:55
inhuman variation in height
48:57
but what we’re fighting here
48:58
is that the variation in eighty eight he symptoms and human population
49:02
is just as genetically influenced
49:05
as human hunting
49:06
in dvd hd-dvd
49:08
is among the top three
49:10
genetically influenced psychiatric disorders
49:12
ever discovered
49:13
rivaled only bipartisan and bipolar disorder
49:17
and we are seeing
49:18
that the traits that make up eighty h tds executive inattentive
49:22
and impulsive traits
49:24
are among the most strongly genetically influenced psychological traits ever
49:29
discovered by science
49:31
intelligence is not the strongly genetically influenced anxiety carries
49:35
only a thirty to forty percent genetic influence less than half of what we see
49:39
in eighty three
49:42
suggesting that we are seeing a marked contribution to genetics
49:46
its contribution to the frontal cortex
49:48
and specifically
49:49
to the symptoms that underlie
49:51
the each team as well
49:53
now print studies art uniform
49:56
across paul studies
49:57
in showing no role of the rearing environment in this disorder
50:01
which is why john groomsmen is absolutely overly wrong
50:05
he’s not only one he’s worse than wrong
50:08
to be worse there are ways to make a declarative statement about what we know
50:12
in the face of all research pointing to the contrary it would be like denying
50:17
gravitational
50:17
effects on the earth’s surface
50:20
and yet we see many people who still believe in the role of parents
50:24
as a contributor to the each t
50:26
and the twin studies say this simply is not
50:30
if you’re looking for an environmental effect
50:32
look at something unique that happened only to this trial
50:36
not to other family members
50:37
and here is where we could see
50:40
biological hazards we’ve already discussed
50:42
the smoking the drinking the premature t
50:45
and the violence
50:48
they highlight heritability has led researchers to begin searching for jeans
50:52
for a_t_t_
50:53
an eighty eight he has been one of the most successful psychiatric disorders
50:57
in terms of identifying reliable candidate genes
51:00
better than bipolar disorder better than autism
51:03
we have been able to identify set of ferry reliable jeans not necessarily
51:07
from it all studies because of the each is genetically heterogeneous
51:12
but in another studies to show when we do what’s called a meta-analysis that
51:16
these gene seem to be holding up
51:18
and the most reliable once at the top
51:21
and then further it down
51:22
the end of the page even just
51:24
a month ago
51:25
the finish studies a dvd h t
51:28
again showed these genes particularly deviates
51:31
as a candidate running for a p_h_d_ now i can’t go into what these teams do it
51:35
you can read about them here quickly
51:37
but the point is that most of these seventeen front of them
51:40
which means regulate dopamine in the human brain
51:44
so we’re going to find
51:45
the dopamine genes are quite likely to be involved in the p_h_d_
51:49
also probably
51:50
are norepinephrine jeans because some of these genes such as d eighty one
51:54
not don’t just influenced opening teams but also drop in africa take
51:58
and the norepinephrine transporter as well
52:01
now what you may not notice it within the last year researchers found that
52:05
this gene critics who will respond to baffle founded a dance pretty rough
52:10
opening the door to the possibility that in very
52:13
your future
52:14
we will be able to do genetic
52:16
typing of children
52:17
and choose the most appropriate rug
52:19
without what we do now which is purely flying blind
52:22
and putting children on medicines and waiting to see what happens
52:26
would be a fascinating area
52:28
of research
52:29
i don’t want to overplay that there was a failure to replicate that finding but
52:33
there are two studies to show that it does
52:35
so it means open the possibility
52:38
their genes determine the best drugs that you respond
52:42
not lastly i want to emphasize in advance here by richard haas group in
52:46
saint louis that shows that there’s probably an interaction
52:49
between environmental biohazard sc
52:52
and genetic risk
52:53
and we can see that here quite clearly
52:55
this is whether your mother smoked during pregnancy or not no or yes
52:59
this is whether you have the dat gene i’ve already mentioned plus meaning you
53:03
do
53:04
minus means you don’t have that christine
53:06
and here’s the d_r_ d fourteen
53:08
look at what happens as we begin combining wrist jeans with an
53:12
environmental toxin
53:13
the most important finding is here
53:15
if you are a few days that carries both christine’s and your mother smoked
53:19
during pregnancy
53:20
uart eight times more likely to get this disorder that anybody with any of those
53:24
single costs
53:26
that is a clear gene by environment interactions also now been found for
53:30
alcohol and it’s beginning to be found other disorders as well
53:34
suggesting that things are more complicated than we thought it isn’t
53:36
just one or the other
53:38
there probably is some interactive effect and i think as i learned this
53:41
morning
53:42
the same thing is probably going to be found for autism as well
53:46
so what can we expect in the future
53:48
you when i can expect the probably in the next five to ten years
53:51
all of the risk change for a dat will be known that looks like there’s probably
53:54
going to be at least twenty of them
53:56
because we’ve now stand the entire human genome
53:59
and that’s the number that seems to be coming up as far as locations alan
54:03
cranston so it’s apologetic disorder
54:05
but that’s going to let us sub-type people
54:08
based on their genetics
54:09
and republican a find that there are different kinds of a d_h_ t
54:12
and different life course cus
54:14
my own milwaukee study has genotype all of the children
54:17
and found that the eighty-one
54:19
is a predictor severe dvd h_d_
54:21
of risk for cigarette addiction
54:23
of your workplace evaluations and therefore performance and up your grade
54:27
point average in high school
54:29
all of which is sort of
54:31
el-ad says a little bit to suggest that
54:33
some teens have life course expression
54:36
and curie rhys
54:37
for certain kinds of impairment and while my study needs to be replicated
54:41
understand jim swanson is finding very similar effects for the d_o_d_ fourteen
54:45
and others so that we may see that depending upon which of these jeans you
54:49
get in and what combination
54:51
there are different risks associated with your kind of a p_h_d_
54:55
and not others
54:55
and as i’ve already mentioned we’re beginning to see the jeans they predict
54:59
drug response
55:00
we may see drug companies developing utterly new chemicals
55:04
for your genotype
55:06
which of course there is something that is not space-age technology here
55:10
but is well within our grasp once we know
55:13
what these genes are and how they express
55:16
in the human brain
55:17
and there may well be that
55:19
fasting possibility
55:21
that genes don’t just predict response to drugs
55:24
probably predict response
55:27
psycho-social treatments
55:29
to summarize advances in research shows that
55:32
eighty eight years of neuro genetic disorder
55:34
than about two thirds of all cases
55:36
are the familial genetic type
55:38
that the remainder are due to various injuries
55:42
events that take place most often prenatally
55:45
some post natalee
55:46
and that no one sees up here
55:49
tv
55:50
video games
55:51
sugar
55:52
and the more popular notions
55:54
that lay people have about a p_h_d_
55:56
but it turned out to be false
55:59
my time is running out and i could spend an entire power on this
56:02
but i simply want to point out that were building models
56:05
five eighty eight years of disorder of the exec system
56:08
that we can break the exec system
56:10
not only into
56:13
innovation which is the principal executive deficit
56:16
but into for others
56:18
there is not a horrible working memory system
56:20
which i have reinterpreted and my writings as the visual imagery system
56:24
there’s the verbal working memory system
56:26
which according to vitality is really just self speech the voice in the mind
56:31
there’s the emotion regulation system which i believe it’s the same one that
56:34
gives a self motivation
56:36
and there is the planning mechanism
56:38
which generates potential responses
56:41
it sort of the innovative
56:43
problem solving
56:44
almost like a simulator would be
56:46
allowing you to simulate mentally
56:48
multiple possible ways of getting to your calls
56:51
and choosing the most effective among them
56:53
to in fact put into play
56:55
research is beginning to show that a_t_t_ interferes with all five of these
57:00
executive systems
57:01
which means that eighty eighty children are just
57:04
uninhibited
57:04
they also have problems with visual imagery
57:08
nonverbal working memory which by the way if you’re not familiar with it
57:11
is the origin of the sense time subjective awareness of time
57:15
which explains why he dat
57:17
so disrupts the individual’s ability to deal with time
57:20
why they’re always late
57:22
never prepared
57:23
never work in time
57:24
begins to explain why each of the children can follow rules and
57:28
instructions
57:28
because they’re internal languages thirty to forty percent behind normal
57:32
children
57:33
and it’s internal language that allows us to do what we’re told
57:36
and the governor own behavior by what we tell ourselves to do that
57:40
it explains very clearly what you do you teach children have a motivation deficit
57:44
why they can play video games for hours
57:46
because the motivation is external
57:49
and provided as a continuous
57:51
reinforcement schedule why they can’t do homework for minutes because homework
57:55
provides no consequences
57:57
and demands internal
57:59
motivation
58:00
self created motivation
58:01
he dat is a self motivation deficit disorder
58:05
which is why they can’t function well
58:07
in environments where there are no consequences
58:09
for immediate
58:11
gratification
58:12
also explains why they are so poor problem solving
58:16
and generating potential possible ways of solving their problems
58:20
and why we see this influence people for call
58:23
spatial and motor fluency tasks
58:26
suggesting that there’s a problem with the planning mechanism
58:28
as well
58:29
i wish i could go over this
58:31
in more detail
58:32
but i’ll just leave you with the implications of an executive you have a
58:35
duty
58:37
giving a teaches an executive disorder tells us that mediate is a form of time
58:41
blindness
58:42
that need to teach the children have been nearsightedness to the future
58:45
that future events have to be immediate and compelling
58:48
before the individual is capable of dealing with them that events that lie
58:52
at a distance across time
58:54
are of no value to these children they can’t
58:57
muster anticipatory responses
58:59
and prepare
59:00
for future events
59:02
put it in another way the each individual lives inferno
59:06
and past and future carved little consequence in the regulation
59:10
of their behavior
59:11
it tells us that needed each team is not a disorder of knowing what to do
59:15
but it is sort of doing what you know
59:18
that it’s a performance problem
59:20
that the a_t_t_ trouble not benefit from skill training
59:23
because they know what their children know but they can’t do is to look at
59:27
their children do with that knowledge
59:29
think of your brain as a two-party system
59:31
the posterior part of the brain is the information acquisition system
59:35
it is where knowledge is acquired and stored
59:38
the final part of the brain
59:39
is a system that puts what you know
59:42
into every day but that to function
59:44
it’s where the rubber meets the road
59:46
it’s where you choose what you know to be as socially accepted as a you will be
59:51
able to be
59:52
they dat like a meat cleaver
59:54
has separated these two mechanisms
59:56
so that what is known
59:58
does not carry forward
59:59
to influence what he’s done
60:02
and even the most brilliant dvd people
60:04
dust stupid things in life
60:07
and we begin to understand this distinction between performance aspects
60:12
a functioning
60:13
and knowledge aspects and it begins to tell us they repeatedly but not to do
60:18
don’t emphasize skill training
60:20
people with a p_h_d_ are not stupid
60:22
and not be ignorant
60:23
they know what other people their age usually no
60:27
the problem isn’t implementing let me know
60:30
they can’t do what they know
60:32
that critical points in the environment that we call the point of performance
60:37
and what is the real like this tells us
60:38
is something that will give you a dvd would say
60:41
only treatment
60:43
treat a performance disorder
60:45
must be
60:46
point of performance
60:49
treatments done away from that point of performance
60:52
will be of absolutely no value
60:54
to dealing with performance disorders
60:57
you must be arrange these critical natural environment with the problems
61:01
occur to help them sure what they know
61:04
to use what they have
61:06
and not put the in long-term psychotherapy
61:09
or playgroups or other things that have no bearing
61:13
on the point
61:14
of performance
61:16
the implications for treatment i’ve already mentioned they are numerous
61:20
skill training is not enough
61:22
we need to work at the point of performance
61:24
we need to look at medication from a very different perspective
61:28
medication for eighty eight he is not psychopharmacology
61:31
it is normal genetic
61:34
therapy
61:34
we can demonstrate that right down to the influence of single teams
61:38
and the way they regulate transport mechanisms
61:41
and postsynaptic sensitivities in single nerve cells
61:45
in the human brain
61:46
we are no longer at an age when we don’t know where didi h_d_ comes from
61:51
we request working at the level
61:53
molecular mechanisms on brain cells
61:56
and proteins that are free
61:58
in those brain cells
62:00
and we can see exactly
62:01
what these medications do
62:03
we know that methylphenidate
62:05
blocks the transporter and that eighty eight individuals
62:07
have more transporters on their nerve cells
62:10
because the issue trotter
62:11
have longer transporter genes
62:13
and longer teens bill greider transport mechanisms so we can link
62:18
jeans
62:19
to a brain mechanism
62:20
to a truck response
62:22
in a very interesting closed-loop now
62:24
that we’ve never been able to close before
62:26
in our explanations
62:28
aviv each key
62:29
and i believe that we need to represent his appropriately to the public
62:34
using medication for a_t_t_ is tantamount to insulin to a diabetic
62:38
it is literally a form of genetic treatment
62:41
at the level of nerve cells within the brain
62:45
productive bring over everything
62:46
you’re not masking the problem you’re not failing to do with some hidden
62:51
psychodynamic or intro familial conflict none of those are pertinent you
62:55
literally are treating the disorder at its source
62:58
and that is an important take-home message
63:00
for many families
63:04
and unimportant
63:06
i could go through many many
63:09
development
63:09
let me leave you with some of the developments
63:13
we don’t have an array
63:15
of medications
63:16
for eighty h t
63:17
the stimulant of which there are two types
63:20
which there are many different delivery systems and more recently
63:24
than on stimulants such as which he wrote
63:27
johnston approved for a dat
63:29
but of course other drugs like antihypertensive ps
63:32
try cytokine depressants that also have a truck hurt
63:35
of helping
63:36
to treat me dat da clearly not as dramatically
63:40
fastest institute
63:41
what is new impeach the research
63:44
that we have
63:45
five delivery system clean out the five keys
63:49
which people need i think to appreciate because some of this is new areas of the
63:52
last six months
63:54
we have to tell us what are the immediate release
63:56
not offended a
63:58
and threatening compounds that we’ve had
64:00
going back to the nineteen fifties in the nineteen thirties
64:03
but we now have
64:04
the methylphenidate pump
64:06
which is concerned which is a miniature almost like a tube of toothpaste
64:10
that went swallowed
64:12
extremes
64:13
liquid methylphenidate for a period of eight to twelve hours
64:17
providing much more continuous coverage in the a_t_t_ individual
64:21
this is what medication three times a day would do
64:24
with immediate ritalin
64:25
and this is what happens
64:26
when you scored out liquid novel from the date
64:29
using this pumping system
64:30
you get a nice
64:32
even continuously
64:33
blood flow of blood level
64:35
that eliminates the valleys
64:37
and the lack of control from the immediate please absolutely ingenious
64:41
system invented by also
64:43
pharmaceuticals and bought up by johnson johnson
64:45
we have the pallet technology system
64:47
which is like they will contact
64:49
cold medicines
64:51
different
64:52
pallets spot methylphenidate or adderall
64:55
coated with different i release
64:57
that does all of at different hours of the day
65:00
some dissolving immediately upon ingestion
65:02
others an hour
65:03
to three for file although we have to eight to ten out of coverage
65:09
this is what he would get with the immediate release them threatening and
65:12
this is what you would get from appellate system
65:15
it takes away the valley
65:17
provides a smoother
65:19
gradation of coverage across the day
65:21
absolute godsend for each teacher often because these extended release systems
65:25
and eliminated
65:27
the need to administer medicines
65:28
at noontime in the schools
65:30
and the associated stigma
65:32
and humiliation that many children were exposed to for many years
65:36
we also have the patch system the forty p
65:39
which is the trial
65:40
methylphenidate in a skin patch
65:42
which can be absorbed continuously
65:44
through the skin eliminating the need to squabble medicines
65:49
outside of course if you get continuous coverage across the day
65:52
the down side as you can take this cut off a couple hours before bedtime or
65:56
you’re not going to sleep
65:57
and the other downside is one important four people in a skin rash
66:01
it is quite annoying
66:03
and that is the methylphenidate irritation of the skin
66:06
but again another delivery system helping us to reach out
66:09
to some cases of a_t_t_ where
66:11
i’m not
66:12
delivery system would be better and finally last august
66:15
comes in most recent invention
66:17
that the f_d_a_ had to create a new name for
66:19
that is the pro drug system
66:21
this is an out of robert reformulated into a drug called five minutes
66:25
by this isn’t absolutely fascinating mechanism because what by the recipient
66:31
is amphetamine bound up with
66:35
life seemed compound
66:36
that prevents the amphetamine
66:38
from being activated
66:40
anywhere
66:41
except
66:42
in stomach and apprenticed
66:45
only in fact area
66:47
will this drug
66:49
activate
66:49
because in the stomach and upper intestine
66:52
there is a protein that splits the light
66:55
seen compound
66:57
off from the amphetamine
66:58
allowing him threatening to go to work
67:01
this is the first not accused of ball and fending
67:04
ever invented
67:06
now as a down or is a by product not a downside but it outside totally
67:10
accidental
67:12
it turns out that this binding mechanism
67:15
issue to the three more hours of coverage
67:17
this trouble s twelve to fourteen hours
67:20
through the longer acting stimulants currently available
67:23
which for adults in particular
67:25
extraordinarily beneficial because of the longer hours of responsibility
67:28
that adults have
67:30
now we have seen developments and psycho-social treatments
67:33
time doesn’t permit me to go through all of them
67:36
and we’ve seen a number of new treatments being proposed to test it
67:39
that continue to remain experimental
67:42
not yet proven shouldn’t be offered to the public although they have been
67:47
but biofeedback for instance where we’ve got lots of promising uncontrolled
67:51
studies
67:52
to randomized trials action l three they didn’t find anything so that needs to
67:56
get sorted out
67:58
we’ve got cognitive training of working memory
68:00
one positive study
68:02
but waiting to see if it replicates
68:04
we’ve got however call scorecard training children and time management
68:07
and organization
68:09
howard is using my theory of a p_h_d_ in the eighty h decrease of massive
68:13
problems with a human sense of time
68:16
and howard’s trying to show that
68:17
can we get in and train that
68:20
if we catch children young enough so he’s got a manual schools and for
68:24
families
68:25
i’m time management training
68:28
brad smith and others
68:29
are working on after-school programs for teenagers
68:32
animals for cal civ trip non-compliant group of a_t_t_ people
68:36
and with brad and others have done
68:37
is to create after-school programs for teens don’t have to go anywhere
68:41
the city state school
68:43
go to a particular
68:45
incomes of paraprofessional
68:46
trained by any chance expert to offer
68:49
after-school services whether that’s true touring further social skills
68:53
whether that’s assistance with
68:55
their sports or other areas of a_t_t_ such as time management
68:59
the teenager doesn’t have to go anywhere
69:01
there is no stigma associated with going to be psychiatry clinic who really
69:05
eliminate some of the hurdles
69:07
to compliant among a p_h_d_ teens
69:09
very fascinating experimental program going on
69:12
both in virginia and caroline
69:14
and then of course
69:15
steve sufferance working independently that of course ramsey
69:18
and rothstein at university and something at
69:21
showing the cognitive behavioral training although it fails for each
69:24
teacher over appears to be effective as a supplement
69:27
for medications for each details
69:30
so i hope i’ve left you with the idea that this is an
69:33
rapidly advancing area of research and eighty h t we’re learning lots of new
69:37
stuff
69:38
continues to be a very exciting area
69:40
not once a month thirty four years of work in this area
69:42
i’ve i’ve been bored there’s always something new coming at us
69:46
and one of the things we can now say is that
69:48
each d
69:49
although it certainly not a benign disorders i said earlier
69:52
this among the most treatable psychiatric disorders
69:55
we have more treatments
69:56
that are more effective
69:57
for more people
69:59
believe it or not been any
70:01
area psychiatry so there’s a great deal of hope that we can provide a better
70:06
future for these children and adults
70:08
and we’ve previously been
70:10
sexual so much
70:21
season is going to ask for people some people that i think at his other
70:27
presentation
70:28
relentlessly until the sale of the starting line for the cities
70:33
websites
70:35
internet
70:36
accidents happen before impact will be available
70:40
misconduct
70:41
critically-acclaimed again time for about five minutes when the questions
70:49
at least in the service of moderating
70:51
sir
70:53
start acting like sheltered workshop
70:57
steve woodward mcveigh
71:01
it remind
71:03
well certainly department carrie nation of that i had to refer to is shown
71:07
workshops because that’s a
71:09
a particular intervention that’s been used for more profoundly
71:12
developmentally disabled individuals but one could certainly like and that the
71:16
phil collins summer treatment program
71:18
and the other
71:19
extend chances intervention programs as being backed into that sort of a
71:24
controlled environment where people come for six or seven hours a day
71:28
exposed to multiple
71:29
training programs
71:31
think the only thing that’s disappointing about these kinds of
71:34
studies
71:35
is that we we have found it
71:37
even environment that we regulate that way
71:39
we get marked improvements in peachtree symptoms
71:43
but there’s no generalizations and on training environment
71:46
there’s nothing that indoors when you stop the training program and that’s
71:49
been the downside
71:51
of these programs
71:52
and we’re trying to solve that through how do we program for generalization how
71:56
do we get the skill to indore haven’t quite worked out yet but it’s just that
72:00
might be possible
72:01
and if you’re ready for cock up you know that
72:03
i did make an argument for
72:04
with teenagers moving more
72:06
into
72:07
vocational training in addition to academic
72:10
training of these individuals
72:11
in order to help
72:12
make them better prepared to enter the workforce and they currently have
72:15
i don’t know that that needs to be done it so intense it in burma sheltered
72:18
workshops i think simple vocational
72:20
technical schools suffice to provide that
72:23
but i think
72:24
the months if you’re talking about is very important one and that is much more
72:28
environmental regulation to a more intensive degree earlier and longer over
72:33
time
72:34
because what we’re learning as we have interventions that work but if they’re
72:37
limited to childhood they make no difference by adulthood
72:40
and they don’t jury over into un treated environments that we didn’t pay
72:44
attention to but i think those pop problems are potentially
72:51
yeah
72:53
hill
72:54
yes not for the faint of heart we want to raise the information you’re going to
72:58
see and or birthday the information at four o’clock session is in the new book
73:06
i want to make sure it is i don’t want to mislead people
73:09
mike my new book is a scholarly silence
73:13
and although it is written for
73:15
clinicians and professionals to read
73:18
but he certainly is not a trade book
73:20
that’s not net howells driven to distraction
73:23
unnamed people who do science will appreciate it because i think it’s
73:26
probably the most definitive statement
73:29
putting adult medium state on the map
73:31
as as a legitimate adult disorder
73:35
if you’re obviously educated well-read you would be able to go to that book but
73:39
i tell people to use it more a sort of a desk reference
73:42
open it to the chapter
73:43
on workplace problems open to the chapter
73:47
early sexual activity driving to a fourth is not meant to be a continuous
73:51
bedtime reading hardly russia novel
73:54
but by any means sep i want to make clear what it is and what it isn’t but
73:58
certainly that’s where all of the results including the new result i
74:01
didn’t talk about tonight
74:03
clinic referred adults with the v_ chip
74:05
it’s all done dot as far as what you saw last year
74:08
you would have to look at my handbook for diagnosis
74:10
combined with trond its recent book on
74:12
the causes of a p_h_d_
74:14
to really begin to pick this up
74:16
and then some of these
74:17
are studies that were published a swim in the last few weeks too few months of
74:21
those are not going to be book at this point
74:25
i think we have a friend and cover
74:29
uh… except for thursday with
74:32
video gaming is on a cartridge university influences severity of the
74:36
well-timed grocery tenant and in canada and steve houghton in upper class turned
74:41
up
74:42
have looked at video-game playing in a p_h_d_ children
74:44
and what they found of course is what parents find at a future travel sustain
74:48
their attention to a video game
74:50
longer than they will to something that’s not computer-generated or
74:53
computer delivered
74:54
so in that sense they have a play those games longer than they do their homework
74:58
but what i was if you look at the way they play the game and what they’re
75:01
doing during the game
75:03
first of all the time to play more solitary wears
75:06
most children
75:07
video games with
75:10
and groups
75:11
and eighty each other more solitary that they have to do with their social
75:14
rejection
75:15
the second thing is you see the executive deficits the more the video
75:18
game demands a lot of management organization strategy overtime you
75:23
finding each other can’t compete with the normal child executive aspects of
75:27
picnicking
75:28
so as rosemary pointed out
75:31
they play video games better than they do other things they are not normal
75:35
in the way the approach gaming and gaming doesn’t make the normal writer
75:38
but it certainly doesn’t
75:40
contributor eighty h d
75:41
as some people have argued that t_v_ video-game playing or cause of a p_h_d_
75:46
and instead i think they got the chicken in the reversed
75:49
people with aviation more likely to watch television are more likely to play
75:52
video games are also more likely to talk my cell phone and not read for pleasure
75:56
but that doesn’t make the state’s causes of a p_h_d_ those of the things that
75:59
people with a_t_t_ gravitate toward
76:01
when they’re given choices in their leisure times
76:07
hi i’m mad
76:09
not finishing our professional and member of the communities
76:13
back in my home
76:15
on yahoo
76:17
very taken with the part about the genetics because
76:20
my husband seventy one two years ago at the list i had aspects and how much his
76:25
head of course all his life
76:27
uh… i have assignments
76:30
compulsive obsessive i have two grandsons with a p_h_d_
76:35
my husband to be risk misdiagnosed like alcoholism with a p_h_d_
76:41
anxiety disorder
76:43